Quoting: ..... Historically, the Western encounter with difference has been catastrophic: the extermination and displacement of aboriginal populations, the transatlantic slave trade, and colonialism. ... Europe’s first encounter with significantly different peoples on a large scale—during its “Age of Discovery”—led to the decimation of 95 percent of the native Amerindian population in what one historian calls “the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world” .... The European encounter with difference also gave rise to the transatlantic slave trade, which, according to demographers’ estimates, may have halved Africa’s population...
Africa was rife with slavery for centuries before the age of Western colonialism. As writes the black intellectual Thomas Sowell, "More whites were brought as slaves to North Africa than blacks brought as slaves to the United States or to the 13 colonies from which it was formed. White slaves were still being bought and sold in the Ottoman Empire, decades after blacks were freed in the United States."
Quote: .... Throughout history, the Chinese have dealt better with difference than have the Europeans,......
Europe was a scene of racial, ethnic and religious tolerance since ancient times. Even Ancient Rome cared not at all about the color of your skin, or your ethnic origin, and for the most part you could practice any of your pagan cultures.
But it was the eastern Mediterranean that gave rise to the Western culture.
There, it was that from a Greek colony in LIbya came to the Egyptian metropolis of Alexandria Eratosthenes, the man who discovered that the Earth is a little world, a spherical planet, and calculated its circumference with an error of only a few percent.
But why there? Why not in the great cities of India, Babylonia, or China?
The people in this part of Europe had several advantages, argues Carl Sagan in "Cosmos" (quot): "Theirs is an island realm. Isolation, even if incomplete, breeds diversity. No single concentration of power could enforce social and intellectual conformity in all the states. ..... Unlike many other cultures, they were at the crossroads of civilizations, not at one of the centers. In Ionia, the Phoenician alphabet was first adapted to Greek usage and wide spread literacy became possible. Writing was no longer a monopoly of the priests and scribes. It was in the Eastern Mediterranean that African, Asian, and European civilizations, including the great cultures of Egypt and Mesopotamia, met and cross-fertilized in a vigorous and heady confrontation of prejudices, languages, ideas and gods."
That is Europe, the place where "the encounter with difference" has been "catastrophic." And it was so "throughout history." - argues Shuchen Xiang, a professor on a Chinese university who got her academic credentials in the heart of present-day Europe.
Don't forget: "By 1914 colonialism had brought 85 percent of the earth under European rule as colonies, protectorates, dependencies, dominions, and commonwealths (29). This colonial world order is now being challenged by China..."
Interesting book, hope to read it one day. I think Chinese cosmopolitan is evident here in Malaysia (where I am presently), where Indian, Chinese and Muslim and indigenous cultures maintain their distinct identities while also sharing a common Malaysian identity.
In Australia (where I have also lived many years), there are many migrants each with their own identities, but Anglo-Saxon identity is quite dominant.
Xiang writes, "the Chinese sought to gain influence over others by having them spontaneously accept the virtue of one’s position." The Chinese imperial system of tribute is good!
Xiang cites U.S. destruction of an ancient cultural site in Iraq. Does her book mention the forced destruction of ancient mosque architecture in Xinjiang?
Xiang funnels things into culture-versus-race conceptual spectrum. This is how she banishes historical materialism.
Quoting: ..... Historically, the Western encounter with difference has been catastrophic: the extermination and displacement of aboriginal populations, the transatlantic slave trade, and colonialism. ... Europe’s first encounter with significantly different peoples on a large scale—during its “Age of Discovery”—led to the decimation of 95 percent of the native Amerindian population in what one historian calls “the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world” .... The European encounter with difference also gave rise to the transatlantic slave trade, which, according to demographers’ estimates, may have halved Africa’s population...
Africa was rife with slavery for centuries before the age of Western colonialism. As writes the black intellectual Thomas Sowell, "More whites were brought as slaves to North Africa than blacks brought as slaves to the United States or to the 13 colonies from which it was formed. White slaves were still being bought and sold in the Ottoman Empire, decades after blacks were freed in the United States."
Quote: .... Throughout history, the Chinese have dealt better with difference than have the Europeans,......
Europe was a scene of racial, ethnic and religious tolerance since ancient times. Even Ancient Rome cared not at all about the color of your skin, or your ethnic origin, and for the most part you could practice any of your pagan cultures.
But it was the eastern Mediterranean that gave rise to the Western culture.
There, it was that from a Greek colony in LIbya came to the Egyptian metropolis of Alexandria Eratosthenes, the man who discovered that the Earth is a little world, a spherical planet, and calculated its circumference with an error of only a few percent.
But why there? Why not in the great cities of India, Babylonia, or China?
The people in this part of Europe had several advantages, argues Carl Sagan in "Cosmos" (quot): "Theirs is an island realm. Isolation, even if incomplete, breeds diversity. No single concentration of power could enforce social and intellectual conformity in all the states. ..... Unlike many other cultures, they were at the crossroads of civilizations, not at one of the centers. In Ionia, the Phoenician alphabet was first adapted to Greek usage and wide spread literacy became possible. Writing was no longer a monopoly of the priests and scribes. It was in the Eastern Mediterranean that African, Asian, and European civilizations, including the great cultures of Egypt and Mesopotamia, met and cross-fertilized in a vigorous and heady confrontation of prejudices, languages, ideas and gods."
That is Europe, the place where "the encounter with difference" has been "catastrophic." And it was so "throughout history." - argues Shuchen Xiang, a professor on a Chinese university who got her academic credentials in the heart of present-day Europe.
Don't forget: "By 1914 colonialism had brought 85 percent of the earth under European rule as colonies, protectorates, dependencies, dominions, and commonwealths (29). This colonial world order is now being challenged by China..."
Which century are we living again...?
Interesting book, hope to read it one day. I think Chinese cosmopolitan is evident here in Malaysia (where I am presently), where Indian, Chinese and Muslim and indigenous cultures maintain their distinct identities while also sharing a common Malaysian identity.
In Australia (where I have also lived many years), there are many migrants each with their own identities, but Anglo-Saxon identity is quite dominant.
The problem is China has adopted western notions of race since 19th century…
Xiang writes, "the Chinese sought to gain influence over others by having them spontaneously accept the virtue of one’s position." The Chinese imperial system of tribute is good!
Xiang cites U.S. destruction of an ancient cultural site in Iraq. Does her book mention the forced destruction of ancient mosque architecture in Xinjiang?
Xiang funnels things into culture-versus-race conceptual spectrum. This is how she banishes historical materialism.
Newsflash: European history started around 1500.