Pekingnology

Share this post

Zheng Yongnian on how to address Western public opinion on China: facts, science, and reason

www.pekingnology.com

Zheng Yongnian on how to address Western public opinion on China: facts, science, and reason

"Be open, open, and more open," especially to businesses, investors, media, universities, and research institutions. And tit-for-tat doesn't work, the professor says.

Zichen Wang
,
Shuyuan Han
, and
Li Huiyan
Feb 21
16
1
Share this post

Zheng Yongnian on how to address Western public opinion on China: facts, science, and reason

www.pekingnology.com

Prof. Zheng Yongnian, the Founding Director of the Institute for International Affairs at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, on January 28 published an article on how China should address Western public opinion on China. His advice is in the last part of the article, and below is a translation.

The emphasis is by Pekingnology.

First, we need to understand how such narratives are formed. Historically, China held a bias due to its self-isolation and limited knowledge of the West. Despite losing the two Opium Wars, Chinese intellectuals at that time still saw Westerners as uncivilized. It was not until China was defeated by Japan, a neighboring country once considered as China's student, that they realized their ignorance and a need for reform. Before China’s Reform and Opening up, Chinese people barely knew anything about the West. They always assumed Westerners were in deep distress, repeating the same lack of understanding of the West.
Similarly, the West’s uncertainty and fear towards China's rise stem from a lack of understanding and even fear of the country, and their ingrained ideology would lead to misconceptions.
China is the world’s second-largest economy. The externalities and influence of its economy on the West are obvious. Upon joining the WTO, some Chinese people also felt unsettled by the externalities of the West. Some said, “the wolf is coming.” Now it is the West that is experiencing such worries.
It is crucial to recognize the significant impact of the Western hypocritical narratives against China, even if they are based on ideology rather than facts. We must also acknowledge that ideology-based public opinion from the West can exert a powerful influence on their policies toward China.

Historically, the West tended to demonize others while presenting themselves as morally superior, which enabled them to apply Social Darwinism to international politics easily and thus legitimizing conflicts and even wars with other nations. Given the Soviet Union’s failure in the ideological arena during the Cold War, we should by no means ignore any ideology-based public opinion toward China from the West.

Second, to make rational responses to the Western ideology-based criticisms, we should draw lessons from the history of the world economy, such as the lessons of the Soviet Union, as well as our practices, such as the rhetorical battle with the West in the past few years. Coming up with an externally-facing public opinion based on a different ideology is not the most effective in addressing public opinion attacks based on an ideology. Empirically, tit-for-tat is ineffective and can worsen the situation. Again, the failure of the Soviet Union is a prime example, as its battle with a Western ideology failed. When faced with China-demonizing based on ideology from the West, we need to do the simplest thing, namely resorting to facts, science, and reason.


Third, and most importantly, China needs to prioritize its sustainable development, which ultimately benefits the country itself. It is important to recognize that the foundation of the government’s governance lies in its citizens, not Western praise. The support from its people is crucial for both the nation’s longevity and stability., China’s sustainable development also benefits the world economy by boosting its growth. As mentioned above, China has been the largest contributor to the growth of the world economy since it joined the WTO.

It is crucial to prioritize the building of a knowledge system based on China’s practical experiences. Regarding global soft power, we need a knowledge system based on our experiences rather than a certain ideology. While there has been a proposal for an autonomous knowledge system, continuous effort is still required.

Fourth, given the substantial externalities of our economy, we must further communicate and coordinate with other countries on economic policies, regardless of their respective sizes. Our duty is to fulfill the responsibility as a major player in the international community, which also benefits China.

After the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, China promised not to devalue its currency, and that commitment became an international public good in Asia. Similarly, after the global financial crisis from 2007 to 2008, China made similar contributions. As China re-opens its economy after the pandemic, it is important not only to take note of the hypocritical comments from certain quarters in the Western world but also to recognize the positive evaluations and high expectations from many international organizations.

Fifth, we must be open, open, and more open. Despite China’s efforts, there remains a persistent ideological camp in the West that views China through an ideological lens, a situation made worse by the past three years of the pandemic. The pandemic was so severe that it hindered travel across borders; as a result, some Western media and scholars tend to assess China through ideology since they couldn’t come here to see the facts with their own eyes.


The assessment of China through a uniform ideological lens appears to have strengthened the original Western ideological camp. However, the United States and the West have more than one ideology,  and not all people believe in the prevailing ideology in the public opinion sphere. China's openness provides a "seeing is believing" opportunity for different groups in the West. China should increase its openness to Western groups, including businesses, investors, media, universities, and research institutions. The changes in their understanding could render those ideological-based public opinions less effective. (Enditem)

Share

In other news, the Center for China and Globalization (CCG) organized a side event during the Munich Security Conference where highly-noteworthy guests spoke.

CCG Update
MSC2023: CCG hosts side event on US-China climate cooperation
On Feb. 18, the non-governmental Center for China and Globalization (CCG) hosted a side event at the Munich Security Conference (MSC) on US-China climate change cooperation titled “Oasis or Mirage: Analyzing China-U.S. Relations on Climate Cooperation…
Read more
a month ago · 3 likes · CCG Update

Share

Other writings by Zheng Yongnian via Pekingnology

Pekingnology
Zheng Yongnian highlights "no reason to change opening-up policy"
Consider the first half of this newsletter a test of your recent China-watching. Please read the translation of a recent article by Zheng Yongnian and answer one question. My answer will be unveiled in the second half of the newsletter. The Chinese-language article was posted on Friday, Sept. 16, on the…
Read more
6 months ago · 10 likes · 4 comments · Zichen Wang
Pekingnology
Zheng Yongnian on Openness, Market of ideas, and Scientific Innovation
Professor Zheng Yongnian, currently Presidential Chair Professor and the Founding Director of the Institute for International Affairs, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK-Shenzhen), is among the highest-profile commentators domestically with a large audience…
Read more
3 months ago · 14 likes · 3 comments · Zichen Wang, Jinhao Bai, and Zhangxu Kang
Pekingnology
Prof. Zheng Yongnian: SOEs driving force for China-U.S. trade, not an impediment
This is based on the speech by Prof. Zheng Yongnian at an online roundtable meeting on China-U.S. economic and trade relations (Nov. 2, 2021) jointly organized by China Center for International Economic Exchanges and the Brookings Institution. In the speech, Prof. Zheng talked about his view of the differences in the political economy between China and …
Read more
a year ago · 2 likes · Zichen Wang

via Ginger River Review by Jiang Jiang

Ginger River Review
Reviving China’s economy through reform, opening-up: Views from Prof. Zheng Yongnian
The arrival of 2023 brings about curiosities as to how the Chinese economy could recover, and take a further step on the "Chinese path to modernization", a concept introduced by the 20th Communist Party of China (CPC) National Congress [See GRR's collection…
Read more
a month ago · 9 likes · Jiang Jiang, Jia Yuxuan, and Yu Liaojie

Share

open neon signage
Photo by Andrei Damian on Unsplash
1
Share this post

Zheng Yongnian on how to address Western public opinion on China: facts, science, and reason

www.pekingnology.com
A guest post by
Shuyuan Han
A guest post by
Li Huiyan
An undergraduate majoring in translation and interpreting at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan.
1 Comment
Halim Gurgenci
Writes Halim’in Günlüğü
Feb 21

This is an insightful article from Prof Zheng. Thank you for sharing with us.

Expand full comment
Reply
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Zichen Wang - CCG
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing