Pekingnology

Share this post

Shiping Tang: A fragile decade ahead?

www.pekingnology.com

Shiping Tang: A fragile decade ahead?

Whenever necessary, China may want to scale back some of its strategic initiatives, especially avoiding unnecessary involvement, writes the internationally influential Chinese social scientist.

Zichen Wang
Mar 18
9
3
Share this post

Shiping Tang: A fragile decade ahead?

www.pekingnology.com

Prof. Shiping Tang 唐世平 is one of the most influential Chinese social scientists internationally. He has five single-authored volumes in English, with the latest being The Institutional Foundation of Economic Development published in September 2022 by Princeton University Press.

He is the 1st Asian and Chinese scholar to win a major book award in international relations and the 1st Chinese scholar to join the editorial board of leading journals in international relations:

1. International Security, No. 1 journal in IR (2021-)

2. International Studies Quarterly (2015-2020), the flagship journal of the International Studies Association

3. Security Studies (2015-), No. 2 journal in international security

4. International Relations (2021-)

Tang is Cheung Kong Distinguished Professor, Ministry of Education, China; Fudan Distinguished Professor & Dr. Seaker Chan Chair Professor School of International Relations and Public Affairs (SIRPA) Fudan University. Below is a recent commentary from him, first published in China Daily on March 15, 2023.

Shiping Tang Headshot

A fragile decade ahead?

Facing multiple uncertainties and pressures, China needs to strategize for a turbulent period that could last 5 to 10 years

The international system faces enormous uncertainties in the next decade, if not longer, reeling under the triple shocks of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the ongoing decoupling between the United States and China. This turbulent period may well last five to 10 years, after which it could take another five to 10 years for the system to stabilize.

The overall distribution of power within the international system will not change drastically in the next decade. The US will remain the largest economy. Europe's core economic status will not be fundamentally shaken, but Ukraine's post-conflict reconstruction will impose considerable pressure on Europe. Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, Russia's strength has been greatly weakened and its image tarnished, while its influence in Central Asia and Central and Eastern European countries has drastically dwindled. Although Russia remains an important strategic partner of China, the China-Russia strategic partnership surely faces growing challenges.

The institutional foundation of the entire international order is also under serious stress. Key countries do not share a basic consensus on the core ideas and institutions of the future international order, and the uncertainty of the overall order exacerbates the fragility of the entire system.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has had a huge impact on transatlantic ties and EU-Russia relations. It will take at least 5 years for the dust to settle. The strategic competition between China and the US may last for 10 years or even longer.

The outlook for global economic growth in the next three to five years is quite negative. Europe, as one of the key economic locomotives, faces increasing uncertainties. China's economic recovery will inevitably be affected by the global economy, and the US economy also faces the risk of falling into recession.

During the height of the Cold War confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union, Deng Xiaoping proposed "peace and development" as a forward-looking theme for international politics and a key foundation for China's subsequent reform and opening-up. This was also in line with the common aspiration of developing nations. China is still pursuing the same goal.

At the regional level, China's most critical partner in the near future is most likely to be Europe, primarily developed countries in Western Europe, followed by Central and Eastern European countries. If China can work together with Europe (especially Germany and France) to play a central role in post-conflict negotiations of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, it may be able to turn this crisis into opportunities, winning Europe's respect and promoting the stabilization of China-EU relations. As long as Europe continues to have close economic ties with China and refrains from joining the "united front" against China led by the US, China will have more room to maneuver.

East Asia occupies a place just as important as Europe for China. Again, as long as the East Asian region continues to forge ever close economic ties with China and refrains from joining the "united front" against China led by the US, China can secure a key foundation of its foreign relations.

Regarding East Asia, China should continue to promote the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.

In Northeast Asia, it is imperative for China to stabilize its relations with Japan and South Korea, and maintain stability on the Korean Peninsula. In Southeast Asia, China should continue to deepen economic ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and seek mutual benefit and win-win outcomes.

The deepening of economic ties with other regions, especially Latin America, the Middle East and Africa, is also a must for China to maintain its economic growth. The situation in the Middle East is far more complex and should be placed under more careful research and judgment.

In terms of specific strategies, China can focus on five areas.

First, China has to hold steady in terms of its strategic focuses, avoid being entangled in unnecessary disputes. Whenever necessary, China may want to scale back some of its strategic initiatives, especially avoiding unnecessary involvement in countries and regions with high uncertainty and risk.

Second, China must push its reform and open up to new levels: this will be the most effective strategy to counter the US' containment efforts. Here, it should be noted that China needs to implement not only inward reform but also outward reform. For example, the Chinese economy needs to be further opened up to private enterprises to stimulate growth. Likewise, China's foreign relations need not only to remain open, but also undergo reform.

Third, economic development must remain China's central focus. Economic growth is the prerequisite for national prosperity, and the great national rejuvenation is primarily based on economic strength. Therefore, China cannot deviate from economic growth as the core task, for which all other measures must serve. The Chinese dream has no foundation without sustained economic development.

Fourth, China must re-evaluate its possible trajectory of overtaking the US as the world's largest economy. The US has maintained an average economic growth rate of about 2 percent in the past 10 years. Since 2010-12, China's economy has begun to show signs of slowing down, its economic growth rate dropping from about 8 percent in 2012 to about 6 percent in 2019 before COVID-19. As a result, the rate at which China was narrowing the economic gap with the US has also slowed down, from 5 to 6 percent per year previously to 3 to 4 percent today. Grasping this trend and crafting effective policies is essential for the competition between China and the US and China's future.

A key measure for the US strategic competition against China is its attempts to cajole and coerce key countries to form a relatively stable "united front" to contain China, via US alliance system. This is the most important variable in the development of China-US relations. Therefore, when examining the balance of power between China and the US, China needs to consider the strength of the allies of both sides, instead of just looking at economic aggregates of the two countries alone.

Fifth, the most urgent task for China and the US is to manage differences and prevent conflicts. The two countries must not violate the other side's bottom line and then try to rebuild bilateral cooperation in some important areas while managing differences and preventing conflicts. By doing so, the two sides can start to accumulate some strategic trust and promote more cooperation along the way.

The author is a distinguished professor at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs at Fudan University. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Share

Other works by Shiping Tang on Pekingnology

Pekingnology
Ukraine as a Solution by Shiping Tang
Pekingnology today is proud to publish Ukraine as a Solution by Professor Shiping Tang 唐世平. Prof. Tang is Cheung Kong Distinguished Professor, Ministry of Education, China; Fudan Distinguished Professor & Dr. Seaker Chan Chair Professor, School of International Relations and Public Affairs (SIRPA), Fudan University…
Read more
a year ago · 22 likes · 3 comments · Zichen Wang
Pekingnology
Taiwan & US elections forecasting WITHOUT opinion polls
(Enable your email to load the pictures.) The 复旦大学复杂决策分析中心 Center for Complex Decision Analysis (CCDA), Fudan University, founded and led by Prof. 唐世平 Shiping Tang, recently reported in a peer-reviewed article on the journal Plos One of two live experiments in forecasting elections with agent-based modeling …
Read more
8 months ago · 4 likes · Zichen Wang

Works by other Fudan scholars on Pekingnology

Pekingnology
Feng Yujun on Russian History, Culture, and Contemporary Development
Dr. Feng Yujun is Professor and Vice Dean, Institute of International Studies, and Director at the Center for Russian and Central Asian Studies, Fudan University in Shanghai. He was former Director, researcher, doctoral supervisor, and academic member of the Russian Institute of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR), Vice P…
Read more
7 days ago · 8 likes · 1 comment · Zhuoning Li, Zichen Wang, and Yuzhe HE
Pekingnology
Lessons from Success & Failure: Indigenous Innovation in China
Pekingnology today presents an exclusive excerpt from the upcoming book China’s Drive for the Technology Frontier: Indigenous Innovation in the High-Tech Industry, due July 7, 2022, published by Routledge. China has become an innovation powerhouse in high-tech industries, but the widely held view assumes the Chinese model is built on technological borrow…
Read more
9 months ago · 10 likes · Zichen Wang
Pekingnology
China's Land Finance by Lan Xiaohuan
Pekingnology is privileged to publish an excerpt from the 2021 Chinese bestseller《置身事内:中国政府与经济发展》Embedded Power: Chinese Government and Economic Development by 兰小欢 Lan Xiaohuan, Associate Professor (with tenure), School of Economics, Fudan University…
Read more
a year ago · 12 likes · Zichen Wang and Alexander Wang
Pekingnology
Fudan's Econ Dean says the "China Model" has been misunderstood & China should change its narrative
The following is a translation of a WeChat blog by Professor 张军 Zhang Jun. Professor Zhang, Senior Professor in Liberal Arts, Dean of the School of Economics at Fudan University, and Director of the China Center for Economic Studies at the prestigious university in Shanghai, was recently named 2022年度财经思想者 “Financial Thinker of the Year 2022” by…
Read more
2 months ago · 9 likes · 1 comment · Zichen Wang, Li Huiyan, and Xinyi Zhang
3
Share this post

Shiping Tang: A fragile decade ahead?

www.pekingnology.com
3 Comments
FFF
Mar 18

The US will remain the largest economy in next decade could be wrong, Fed having increasingly difficult time controlling QE & balance sheet to reaching their goal- inflation, US dollars rate...etc, economy could be continue mess rolling over in next decade, bipartisan political fighting.... we'll see...

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply
Sarah Aubrey Lee
Mar 22

Completely agree with FFF and Thol C, although I would include that the 5 points brought up in the article is very rational and relevant. I was disappointed to see that the author saw Russia's reputation as taking a big hit and diminishing on the world stage. To echo Thol C, it makes me wonder which world stage the professor refers to. As can be seen by the increased connection between Russia, Africa and Asia, it hints that the professor regards the Global South as small regional players not worthy of mentioning. Putting aside the population impact they have, the economical impact they can have is noteworthy too.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 more comment…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Zichen Wang - CCG
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing